X-PSI Knee System_v1

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Establish implant accuracy with X-PSI Knee System - A multi-center, prospective, non-controlled post market study

  • IRAS ID

    226693

  • Contact name

    Adrian Harvey

  • Contact email

    office@adrian-harvey.co.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Zimmer Biomet

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    DRKS, DRKS00011851

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 4 months, 31 days

  • Research summary

    Patient-specific instruments (PSI) provide surgeons with an anatomically personalized surgery tool. The newly developed and CE-marked X-PSI Knee System is based on X-rays used to generate a pre-operative 3D model of the knee. The total knee replacement surgery will then be planned according to this 3D model. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of this new PSI system generated by x-rays for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The X-PSI pin guides are designed to facilitate a more simplified, efficient and customized TKA procedure compared to conventional, non-guided instrumentation.
    The aim of this multi-center, prospective, non-controlled post-market study is to scientifically document the accuracy and subsequent clinical performance of the X-PSI Knee System. To evaluate the accuracy of the X-PSI Knee System, early postoperative (4-6 weeks) imaging data will be analysed with regards to the mechanical alignment (hip-knee-ankle angle) of the leg and matched to preoperative planning imaging data. The X-PSI Knee System cohort will then be compared with current literature (70% of cases within ±3 degrees) where patients were conventionally operated with non-guided surgery. No control group will be studied. The study population will be compromised of males and females requiring total knee arthroplasty and satisfy the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The study will last one (1) year from the time of surgery.
    The collected data aim to improve the treatment of patients suffering from degenerative joint diseases and their quality of life. In addition, shorter surgery times possibly result in reduced risk of infection, decreased time of anaesthesia and better cost-effectiveness.

  • REC name

    East of Scotland Research Ethics Service REC 2

  • REC reference

    17/ES/0148

  • Date of REC Opinion

    19 Dec 2017

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion