Work outcome measures in arthritis and musculoskeletal conditions

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of work patient reported outcome measures in people with rheumatoid arthritis in the UK, Sweden and the Czech Republic; and in osteoarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis or fibromyalgia in the UK.

  • IRAS ID

    233651

  • Contact name

    Alison Hammond

  • Contact email

    a.hammond@salford.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of Salford

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    3 years, 0 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    Many people with arthritis struggle at work. Therapists and researchers need good quality assessments to find out: the work problems of working people with arthritis; what services can help them; if work rehabilitation helps; and how arthritis affects working lives. To do this, assessments must ask about what people with arthritis think is important. They must be valid (i.e. ask about what they say they do). They must also be reliable (i.e. give the same answers, given nothing changes when they are done a second time).

    We will adapt seven self-report assessments, developed in Canada, for the UK. These ask about: job difficulties; work policies and support at work; managing arthritis and work; support from managers/co-workers; work stress; work-life balance; and changes at work people make because of arthritis. We will ask 20 working people (at least 5 each with either rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis or fibromyalgia) about what is in the assessments. We will make any changes needed.

    We will then ask working people with arthritis, identified from out-patient occupational therapy, physiotherapy or rheumatology departments, patient organisations or research volunteers, to take part. We will mail them a questionnaire booklet to fill in at home in their own time. About 2 to 3 weeks later, we will mail a second booklet. Booklets are mailed back to us. We will then statistically compare the assessments’ scores to see if they are reliable and valid.

    We will publish the assessments so they can be used by therapists and researchers.

  • REC name

    East Midlands - Leicester South Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    17/EM/0409

  • Date of REC Opinion

    20 Nov 2017

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion