WIDE study: Wound Infection Detection Evaluation study

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A single-centre, controlled, prospective cohort study investigating the accuracy of the Glycologic test kit to detect bacterial infection in wounds.

  • IRAS ID

    223153

  • Contact name

    Leon Jonker

  • Contact email

    leon.jonker@cumbria.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Cumbria Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 0 months, 30 days

  • Research summary

    Bacterial infection of wounds carries the risk of further complications including cellulitis, necrotising fasciitis, and sepsis. Specific wounds, such as diabetic foot ulcers may lead to amputation if osteomyelitis develops. An additional undesirable effect of infection of wounds is that it delays – or stops altogether – the wound healing process. Quantitative detection of infection is still done by taking a swab of the wound and then culturing the pathogens in a microbiology laboratory. Obtaining these results generally takes days; even molecular profiling does not give an instant result.
    Clinical guidelines stipulate that microbiological testing should only be used to identify the pathogen strain in clinically confirmed infection. Therefore, clinical opinion is the mainstay of predicting and diagnosing infection. The lack of a simple cost-effective and repeatable testing method may have three consequences: 1) lack of uniformity in diagnosis, due to differences in clinical judgement, which in turn may result in 2) over-diagnosis of infection with inappropriate prescription of antibiotics or antimicrobial dressings, or 3) late presentation of patients with systemic signs and spreading cellulitis or osteomyelitis requiring hospital admission and treatment with intravenous antibiotics or emergency surgery.
    The provision of a reliable and sensitive infection detection test kit for infection, which can be used at point-of-care, has the potential to provide the NHS with significant cost savings as well as improving the outcomes for patients.
    This study seeks to evaluate to what degree the newly developed Glycologic detection kit detects infection in comparison to clinical judgement and microbiological diagnosis.

  • REC name

    London - Bromley Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    17/LO/0703

  • Date of REC Opinion

    2 May 2017

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion