Why people in mental health distress repeatedly attend ED

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Why people in mental health distress repeatedly attend a local Emergency Department

  • IRAS ID

    196974

  • Contact name

    Karon Glynn

  • Contact email

    karon.glynn@newarkandsherwoodccg.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Sheffield Hallam University

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    2 years, 0 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    The study will seek to understand what factors determine frequent attendance, for mental health presentations, at a local Emergency Department (ED) from a service user perspective. The research will focus on those 18 years or above, identified as having a primary mental health diagnosis who frequently attend; at least 4 times in a 12 month period.

    How is it of relevance and importance to patients and public?
    ED are under immense pressure and are failing to hit their 4 hour access targets. Some patients locally are waiting over 12 hours to be assessed and treated The data gathered will inform planning and delivery of services and could change care pathways.
    What? Broadly what area (disease, therapy or service) is being studied?
    The research will be a Narrative Inquiry and will focus on initially 10 people identified as having a primary mental health diagnosis who frequently attend ED.
    Who? Who would be eligible?
    Those who attended ED on at least 4 occasions during last 12 months and can consent to taking part in the study
    Where? The type of sites where the study will be conducted.
    Why? What Who?
    The study will take part at Kings Mill Hospital, Mansfield. It could also involve interviewing patients on in-patient units.
    How? How long will the study last and what will the participants undergo?
    The research will take 2 years the study interviews will take approximately 1 hour.

  • REC name

    East Midlands - Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    16/EM/0059

  • Date of REC Opinion

    16 May 2016

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion