VALU-CF
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Evidence-based valuation of patient-centred outcomes in Cystic Fibrosis
IRAS ID
258284
Contact name
Siobhan Carr
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
Royal Brompton and Harefield Foundation Trust
Duration of Study in the UK
1 years, 6 months, 1 days
Research summary
The proposed research will improve our ability to value outcomes in cystic fibrosis (CF) from the perspective of those for whom they are most relevant – the patients and their families. It will focus clinicians and health services on delivering these outcomes and considering them when treatment choices are made.
We propose a mixed methods study (survey and interview) to enable us to understand the relative importance of different treatment outcomes in CF for the patients perspective, and to derive utility weights for two of these outcomes for use in future for use in economic evaluations of CF interventions: reduced pulmonary exacerbations with/without hospitalisation, and reduced treatment burden. The survey will include validated instruments to help us better understand both perceived treatment burden in CF and its relationship with health related quality of life (HRQoL). To measure treatment burden, we will use the generic Multimorbidty Treatment Burden Questionnaire (MTBQ) which has been validated for use in older adults with chronic conditions. We will also collect perceived treatment burden using the three items that form the treatment burden domain of the CFQ-R condition-specific HRQoL measure and the three treatment burden items included in the CFQoL HRQoL measure. To measure HRQoL, we will use the EQ-5D-5L tool which is a generic tool with limited clinical utility but it is a recognised measure for use in cost utility analyses For participants who have taken part in the LwCF study, we will also ask permission to link their reponses with data from the LwCF study (which is collecting HRQoL data using three HRQoL questionnaires). At the time of the survey and interviews, clinical information on disease severity will be recorded. This is routinely collected data that is part of normal clinical care and no extra tests or measures will be made for this research.REC name
Yorkshire & The Humber - Leeds West Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
19/YH/0423
Date of REC Opinion
18 Feb 2020
REC opinion
Favourable Opinion