Usability Evaluation of the Accubio Bowel Health Self-Test

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Performance and Usability Evaluation of the Accubio Stomach Ulcer Self-Test (product code: GCHP-602a-H1)

  • IRAS ID

    336374

  • Contact name

    Tara Moore

  • Contact email

    lmlassiltd@gmail.com

  • Sponsor organisation

    Accubio

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 11 months, 31 days

  • Research summary

    Background: The Accubio Bowel Health Self-Test is a qualitative assay for the detection of haemoglobin in stool samples. It is intended to aid in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal disorders, including bowel cancer. Although performance data for the kit has been completed the test is intended for self-testing at home by lay-users and therefore user testing is required.
    Aim: To assess the usability of the Accubio Bowel Health Self-Test by untrained lay-users representative of the intended user population in a simulated use environment.
    Methods: Forty-five participants (reflecting a variation in age (40-74 years), gender, ethnicity and education attainment) will be recruited using community recruitment strategies and asked to undertaken a simulated Accubio Bowel Health Self-Test. Participants will be given the specific instructions and kit configuration included in the Bowel health Self-Test and a trained researcher will conduct a usability evaluation where use errors will be observed and recorded. In addition, knowledge task assessments will be carried out along with user feed-back on the test. No actual participant or clinical sample is required, and no technical performance attributes of the test will be evaluated.
    Outcome: The Bowel Health Self-Test will be considered acceptable if ≥90% of all tasks consolidated across all user groups are completed successfully (to include successes, alternative successes, close calls and difficulties).

  • REC name

    London - Bloomsbury Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    23/PR/1413

  • Date of REC Opinion

    21 Dec 2023

  • REC opinion

    Unfavourable Opinion