Uptake, effectiveness, and safety of COVID-19 vaccines [COVID-19]

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Uptake, effectiveness, and comparative safety of new COVID-19 vaccines by age, sex, region, ethnicity, comorbidities, medication, deprivation, risk level and evidence of prior COVID infection.

  • IRAS ID

    300573

  • Contact name

    Julia Hippisley-Cox

  • Contact email

    julia.hippisley-cox@phc.ox.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of Oxford / Clinical Trials and Research Governance

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    2 years, 0 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    Research Summary

    The aim is to undertake rapid assessment of uptake, safety and effectiveness of the new COVID-19 vaccines by examining effectiveness and risks of a range of serious outcomes among people receiving the different vaccines and unvaccinated patients. We will achieve this through the analysis of GP electronic health records linked to hospital, mortality and vaccination records. The study is funded as a national priority study via HDR-UK and NIHR.
    The secondary objectives are:

    (A) To determine vaccine uptake by vaccine type and subgroups including age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation, region, co-morbidities (including transplants), medication use and QCovid risk score and prior COVID-19 status. This will include analyses of patients where two different vaccinations may have been used in an individual.
    (B) To determine vaccine safety by vaccine type and time since vaccination and by subgroups including age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation, region, care home status, household size, co-morbidities8 (including transplants), medication and prior COVID-19 status (including new variants of concern).
    (C) To estimate vaccine effectiveness by evaluating the risk and severity of a COVID-19 diagnosis by vaccine type, time since vaccination and following one or two doses of vaccination and by previous COVID-19 positivity status and co-morbidity.

    Summary of Results

    The study was not actually activated under this approval. The reason was that the relevant data became available from an existing REC approved database (18/EM/0400) which is the QResearch data linkage project. The study is being reported via the annual reports for 18/EM/0400 (IRAS 257790) https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fu2790089.ct.sendgrid.net%2Fls%2Fclick%3Fupn%3DXv3JSvJ-2B3M71ppf7N9agbZPWkiaLoTn5nyfqPM65-2BR2XH50vW8lfnsEqFvU9-2Bxxtn2MnOW1qqIeeq5PSwA0Wb6SRx6u4aDK6zOjAN6e2MPbNfZDNYq-2Fo04qIX79snv-2BjRBNz_E1aO2-2BZlVOSJJV-2FajQqskegTd6IRomHYTi-2Fbt8SH3YLbulB2s161qd5ZH0yHL6yegkNdoeX1-2BGOwvNafLZHsjn-2FjYCWvI6ugUgI5sLdQLQFnbS1xyR0nY3KoudXkoIEy39eV2XETDk4d9SXHqA8rMIqFWZD0i15bdP9-2BeP1IQEpWR-2BjAO6FKNRrqtLWfto-2BL2kWHs6aApF8rjZlLol0k-2BQ-3D-3D&data=05%7C01%7Capprovals%40hra.nhs.uk%7C5322c43542654868092808db4c8ea5c1%7C8e1f0acad87d4f20939e36243d574267%7C0%7C0%7C638187947789181074%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=e07R1ySorPuJKPiNKtn8xiDJsOYyMovdebqob206Ong%3D&reserved=0 project OX107

  • REC name

    London - London Bridge Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    21/HRA/2058

  • Date of REC Opinion

    26 May 2021

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion