UK FROST (United Kingdom Frozen Shoulder Trial)

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Multi-centre randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation and nested qualitative study comparing early structured physiotherapy versus manipulation under anaesthesia versus arthroscopic capsular release for patients referred to secondary care with a frozen shoulder (Adhesive Capsulitis)

  • IRAS ID

    161888

  • Contact name

    Stephen Brealey

  • Contact email

    stephen.brealey@york.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

  • ISRCTN Number

    ISRCTN48804508

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    4 years, 8 months, 30 days

  • Research summary

    Frozen shoulder is a painful and debilitating condition causing stiffness and disability in the affected shoulder and arm. The capsule, or the soft tissue envelope around the ball and socket shoulder joint, becomes scarred and contracted, making the shoulder very tight, painful and stiff. It affects around 1 in 12 men and 1 in 10 women of working age, causing interference with their work, domestic and leisure activities. Although this condition tends to improve and settle with time (typically taking 1 to 3 years), for some people it causes severe symptoms and needs more active treatment.

    Treatment in hospital may involve:
    1) Early structured physiotherapy (ESP), steroid injection is also used for pain relief.
    2) Manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) is a day case procedure which involves controlled manipulation of the affected shoulder whilst the patient is under general anaesthesia. The manipulation stretches and tears the tight capsule restoring range of motion to the shoulder.
    3) Athroscopic capsular release (ACR), typically as a day case procedure, is where the contracted and tight shoulder capsule is released using arthroscopic (keyhole) techniques, followed by manipulation to confirm restoration of range of motion in the shoulder.

    Although all three of these treatments are regularly provided in the NHS, we do not currently know which one works best and at what cost. We will compare the above three treatments by randomly putting patients into one of three groups. There will be more patients allocated to the latter two groups.

    We will measure improvements in participants’ pain, function and general well-being at 3, 6 and 12 months following their entry into the trial. We will also assess any problems or complications that may arise following these treatments. In addition, we will ask some patients and doctors about their experience of frozen shoulder. We will also review and update the literature at the end of the study about which treatments work for patients with frozen shoulder.

  • REC name

    North East - Newcastle & North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    14/NE/1176

  • Date of REC Opinion

    18 Nov 2014

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion