TUBE Trial

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A feasibility randomised controlled trial of pre-treatment gastrostomy tube versus oral feeding plus as-needed nasogastric tube feeding in patients undergoing chemo-radiation for head and neck cancer.

  • IRAS ID

    145788

  • Contact name

    Vinidh Paleri

  • Contact email

    vinidh.paleri@nuth.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

  • Research summary

    Head and neck cancer is a serious problem affecting our society. Treatment involves chemo-radiation which will make eating and drinking more difficult and can affect swallowing. People undergoing this treatment are likely to require a feeding tube for a while during and following their chemo-radiation treatment.
    Where feeding assistance is necessary it is currently provided by two standard and well established methods used in the NHS. These methods are:
    1) fitting a gastrostomy tube known as a PEG (a feeding tube inserted into the stomach) BEFORE the beginning of chemo-radiation treatment. The gastrostomy tube is known as a PEG because of the tube’s medical name (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy).
    or
    2) fitting a nasogastric tube known as an NGT (tube running through the nose into the throat and down to the stomach) when needed. This is usually sometime AFTER beginning chemo-radiation treatment when eating, drinking and swallowing becomes difficult.
    Most people only need feeding tubes to help with feeding for a short time. Both options are good for keeping patients well-nourished during and following chemo-radiotherapy treatment however we do not know which of these options leads to a better swallowing ability or quality of life in the short- or longer-term. This is why we are studying the use of these two types of feeding tubes on patients’ short- and long-term quality of life.
    This study is a “pilot or feasibility study” which will test the methods that we might use in a larger study on this subject in future. We need to do a pilot study in order to estimate how many people to include in a larger study and to be sure that we get the design of the study right. We will aim to recruit at least 60 patients into this study.

  • REC name

    North East - Newcastle & North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    14/NE/0045

  • Date of REC Opinion

    27 Feb 2014

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion