Tube feeding in children having a bone marrow transplant

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A mixed methods study investigating complications, outcomes and family experiences of gastrostomy feeding in paediatric allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.

  • IRAS ID

    281830

  • Contact name

    James Evans

  • Contact email

    james.evans@gosh.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Great Ormond Street Hospital

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    3 years, 0 months, 0 days

  • Research summary

    Study investigating problems, results and experiences of tube feeding in children having a bone marrow transplant

    Background

    Children need a bone marrow transplant (BMT) to treat illnesses including cancer. Hospital stays for BMT start with the child having cancer medicines. These cause side effects including sickness and diarrhoea, meaning all children become unable to eat and need feeding through a tube. Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) offer families a choice of two feeding tubes in meetings before admission. One is put through the child’s nose, down into their stomach (a nasogastric tube), the other is placed during an operation from outside to inside the stomach (a gastrostomy). Other UK hospitals only use nasogastric tubes.

    Research questions

    What are the opinions of staff in BMT hospitals to tube feeding?
    What problems and results happen with both tubes?
    What are families experiences of tube feeding?

    Answers to these questions will improve care and families' decision making when choosing feeding tubes. If gastrostomy feeding is found to be safe it could be offered in all hospitals.

    Methods

    Work package 1: Questionnaire
    Staff working in UK BMT hospitals will be asked about current practices and feelings towards tube feeding.

    All families having BMT at GOSH over 1 year will be invited to take part in parts 2-3:

    Work package 2: Cohort study
    Results including problems with feeding tubes, dietary intakes and growth, will be compared between 9-15 children with a gastrostomy versus 30-50 with a nasogastric tube, from admission to six months after BMT.

    Work package 3: Interviews
    Families from package 2 will be interviewed twice; on admission to ask why they did or did not chose a gastrostomy, and after discharge to talk about their experience of tube feeding. Children will use a memory box and scrapbooks to explain their feelings.

  • REC name

    North East - Newcastle & North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    21/NE/0046

  • Date of REC Opinion

    25 Feb 2021

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion