The Relationship Between Insight of Illness and Treatment Engagement

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    The Relationship Between Insight of Illness and Treatment Engagement

  • IRAS ID

    340296

  • Contact name

    Charlie Bickley

  • Contact email

    charliebickley@cygnethealth.co.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Cygnet Hospital Blackheath

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 1 months, 27 days

  • Research summary

    The present study aims to find out whether patients who believe their condition -
    . is long lasting and recurring (timeline)
    . has a more severe impact (consequences)
    . is treatable (treatment control)
    . can be influenced by their own actions (personal control)
    . is less understandable (coherence)
    . that its symptoms are attributable to mental health difficulties (identity)
    - predicts better engagement scores from both the patient and staff.

    This will be achieved by participants completing the Illness Perception Questionnaire for Schizophrenia (IPQS) which measures the Common-Sense Model (CSM) constructs.

    Constructs:
    . Timeline (beliefs about the temporal course of the illness)
    . Control:
    - Treatment control (beliefs about the treatability of the condition)
    - Personal control (belief that one can influence the condition through one’s own actions)
    . Identity (beliefs about the diagnosis and symptoms)
    . Cause (belief about its aetiology)
    . Consequences (beliefs about the wider impact of the condition on one’s life)
    . Coherence (how much the person believes they understand their condition)

    Patients will complete the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA; only the action sub-scale); measuring the degree to which a participant perceives that they are taking active steps to address their mental health difficulties e.g. “I am actively working on my mental health problems.”

    Staff will complete the Treatment Engagement Rating (TER). TER is an observer-rated questionnaire that contains nine subscales: participation, constructive use of sessions, openness, efforts to change behaviour, efforts to improve socio-economic situation, making sacrifices, goal directedness, reflection between sessions, and global evaluation of treatment engagement.

  • REC name

    East Midlands - Derby Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    24/EM/0251

  • Date of REC Opinion

    12 Nov 2024

  • REC opinion

    Unfavourable Opinion