The Midlands and North of England Stillbirth Study - MiNESS

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    The Midlands and North England Stillbirth Study - MiNESS

  • IRAS ID

    106329

  • Contact name

    Alexander Heazell

  • Contact email

    alexander.heazell@manchester.ac.uk

  • Research summary

    The United Kingdom has one of the highest rates of stillbirth in Europe, with more than 4,000 stillbirths every year; which equates to more than 11 deaths every day. Furthermore, this rate has changed very little over the last 20 years. This loss of life and the adverse psychological consequences urgently needs addressing.

    A recent New Zealand study investigating modifiable factors associated with stillbirth (the Auckland Stillbirth Study) found that mothers who did not go to sleep on their left side had a twofold risk of late stillbirth (≥28 weeks gestation) compared to mothers who did go to sleep on their left side. These novel findings need urgent confirmation.

    This proposed study aims to confirm or refute these findings and to ascertain whether a preventative programme should be introduced. This proposed study aims to confirm or refute the findings of the Auckland Stillbirth Study. Participants will be recruited from maternity units in the Midlands and North of England (led by centres in Liverpool, Manchester, West Yorkshire and Birmingham). 290 women with a singleton late stillbirth without congenital abnormality will be interviewed by research midwives shortly after the birth. A control group of 580 women with ongoing pregnancies will be interviewed at a gestation group matched to that at which stillbirths occurred.

    These data will determine whether an intervention study should be considered. If there is a causal relationship between maternal sleep position and late stillbirth we estimate that upto 37% of late stillbirths might be prevented.

  • REC name

    North West - Greater Manchester Central Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    13/NW/0874

  • Date of REC Opinion

    20 Jan 2014

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion