The INSPIRE Study

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    The INSPIRE Study: InVivo Study of Probable Benefit of the Neuro-Spinal Scaffold™ for Safety and Neurologic Recovery in Subjects with Complete Thoracic AIS A Spinal Cord Injury

  • IRAS ID

    195032

  • Contact name

    Manjunath Prasad

  • Contact email

    Manjunath.Prasad@stees.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    InVivo Therapeutics

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    NCT02138110

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    10 years, 0 months, 28 days

  • Research summary

    The purpose of this study is to assess the benefits and safety of a new medical device, the Neuro-Spinal Scaffold ™. The Scaffold is intended for use in patients age 16 – 70 years diagnosed with a T2 – T12/L1 (neurological spinal cord level) functionally complete spinal cord injury (AIS A) for whom open spine surgery (e.g., laminectomy, spine stabilization) which allows access to the dura of the injured spinal cord is recommended as an option. The Scaffold is intended to be implanted in a post-irrigation cavity at the epicenter of the spinal cord contusion during open spine surgery. The Scaffold is intended to act as a physical substrate for cell growth, appositional healing, and tissue remodeling, and preserve the structural integrity of the cord. The Scaffold is intended for use in recent (≤96 hours) spinal cord injuries that do not involve penetrating injury to the cord or complete severing of the cord.

    You will be in the study for 10 years following your surgery and your doctor or nurse will ask you to complete an number of questionnaires , take blood tests and have scans. After year 2 you will receive a telephone call once a year to check on your progress
    The study is funded by InVivo Therapeutics and is being carried out in two NHS hospitals in the UK
    If you join the study, you will also receive all standard of care treatments by the doctors taking care of you for your type of injury.

  • REC name

    Yorkshire & The Humber - Leeds West Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    17/YH/0038

  • Date of REC Opinion

    25 May 2017

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion