The HAPI Study

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Does the Corin Optimised Positioning System improve clinical outcome in total hip arthroplasty? A multi-centre, two-arm randomised control trial

  • IRAS ID

    216084

  • Contact name

    Sue King

  • Contact email

    sue.king@ndorms.ox.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of Oxford

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    3 years, 3 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    We aim to investigate whether the use of the Corin Optimised Positioning System (OPS) for implant positioning during total hip replacement (THR) is superior to current implant positioning practice during THR by way of a randomised controlled trial comparing the two.

    At present, the dislocation rate after THR reported in Joint Registries is between 1 and 3%, with studies reporting a dislocation rate as high as 15%. A recent study showed that 58% of patients who had suffered dislocation after THR had implants judged to be in a safe position. This has led to suggestions that the previous idea of one generic 'safe zone' may be misleading, and instead there is a unique optimum position to place the prosthetic cup in each patient undergoing THR, based on the unique interaction of their spine and pelvis.

    The Corin OPS is a new technique designed to enable delivery of the prosthetic cup into the optimum position for each patient. Dynamic preoperative imaging allows creation of a model, which facilitates accurate placement of the cup.

    We will perform a randomised controlled trial of 476 patients. 238 will receive THR will conventional positioning; the other 238 will receive THR with Corin OPS to guide positioning. Patients will be aged 18-85 years, listed for THR at a participating site. Primary outcome will be dislocation rate at 1 year. We predict recruitment will take 2 years. The study will be funded by Corin PLC

  • REC name

    South Central - Oxford B Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    17/SC/0506

  • Date of REC Opinion

    4 Dec 2017

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion