The fracture healing study

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international study to assess the effects of 2g per day of strontium ranelate versus placebo on the time to fracture healing in osteoporotic men and women.

  • IRAS ID

    39480

  • Contact name

    David Marsh

  • Sponsor organisation

    Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier

  • Eudract number

    2009-014271-41

  • ISRCTN Number

    Not Sent

  • Research summary

    Elderly patients with osteoporosis have an increased time to fracture healing. Strontium ranelate is a treatment for osteoporosis and this study is looking at the effect of strontium ranelate on the fracture healing time in osteoporotic patients with wrist fractures. To date there are no treatments on the market for the treatment of fractures. Patients will be treated as normal following their wrist fracture (they will still have their wrist put in a cast). However if a patient consents to being involved in the study they will have a bone mineral density scan in order to check if they are osteoporotic and if they are they will be randomly assigned into two groups: to take either strontium ranelate or placebo (a dummy drug) for a 24 week period. Patients will have a 50:50 chance of being assigned to either group. All patients, in both groups, will also be given calcium and vitamin D supplements, which are recommended for the treatment of osteoporosis. Patients will be followed up periodically (at week 4,6,7,8,9,10,12,14,16, 18 and 24 weeks post fracture) to assess the fracture healing, by X-ray, during the study. The study will also be looking at the time to return to normal function of the wrist and this will be assessed by various questionnaires and looking at the patients?? hand function using a test that demonstrates how well the patient??s hand can grip.

  • REC name

    London - Bloomsbury Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    10/H0713/28

  • Date of REC Opinion

    26 May 2010

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion