The assessment of risk and safety in mental health services.

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    The assessment of risk and safety in mental health services.

  • IRAS ID

    219895

  • Contact name

    Lynne Macrae

  • Contact email

    fbmhethics@manchester.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of Manchester

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    Z6787610, University of Manchester Data Protection; 8D594/ECC0020, NHS Information Governance Toolkit

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 9 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    The assessment and management of risk is a core function for mental health practitioners. Risk assessments may be useful in categorising patients into low, medium or high risk groups, based on their current situation which can then guide appropriate treatment. However, the clinical assessment of suicide risk is challenging as each individual will present with different risk factors. There are a variety of tools currently being used in mental health services, some of which are locally developed and typically are not validated. The National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide (NCISH) previously looked at clinical assessments prior to suicide and have reported a ‘low risk paradox’, i.e. clinicians rated the immediate risk of suicide as low or none at final service contact for the vast majority of patients who went on to die by suicide. The aim of this study will be to identify risk assessment tools used by mental health practitioners and investigate the way they are used, especially in people who have been classified as at low/no risk of suicide. The views of health professionals on the use of these tools and how they may be improved will also be investigated. Data will be collected via telephone interviews asking clinicians to express their views on risk assessment tools. In addition, a web based survey on the use of risk assessment tools will be completed by mental health practitioners, managers, service users, and carers. The findings of this study will be valuable in informing national policy on risk assessment and improvement of risk tools.

  • REC name

    North West - Greater Manchester South Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    17/NW/0345

  • Date of REC Opinion

    26 Jun 2017

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion