TEP versus open minimal suture repair for the Sportsman's groin.
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Total ExtraPeritoneal (TEP) versus open minimal suture repair for treatment of sportsman’s hernia/athletic pubalgia: A randomized multicenter trial.
IRAS ID
148991
Contact name
Aali J Sheen
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
University of Manchester
Research summary
Sportsman’s hernia is defined as a weakness or disruption of the posterior wall of the inguinal canal. Open hernia repair with or without mesh or laparoscopic techniques with mesh have been advocated in the treatment of sportsman’s hernia and associated athletic pubalgia. The results of the operative treatment from single centers are reported to be good to excellent in between 70-90% of patients with the most promising results reported using an open minimal repair (OMR) technique. There are no randomized trials comparing open versus laparoscopic techniques regarding time for recovery and relief of pain. The aim of this randomized study is to compare the effectiveness of OMR technique in local or spinal anesthesia to endoscopic Total ExtraPeritoneal (TEP) technique in general anesthesia for the treatment of Sportsman´s hernia/athletic pubalgia. The primary endpoint is patient being free from intractable groin pain during sports activity or daily work four weeks after surgery.
REC name
North West - Greater Manchester Central Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
14/NW/1046
Date of REC Opinion
10 Sep 2014
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion