SUAVE - Sunitinib versus dacarbazine in metastatic uveal melanoma
Research type
Research Study
Full title
A randomised phase II study of sunitinib versus dacarbazine in the treatment of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma
IRAS ID
42866
Contact name
Ernest Marshall
Sponsor organisation
Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology
Eudract number
2008-008794-55
ISRCTN Number
N/A
Research summary
Uveal melanoma is the most common primary cancer involving the eye and is characterised by an unpredictable clinical course and a tendency to metastasise (spread) late. Overall prognosis is significantly worse than for a different type of eye cancer known as 'cutaneous melanoma', with 5 and 15 year survival rates of 72% and 53%, respectively. Control of the primary cancer in the eye can be achieved using various radiotherapy techniques or removal of the affected eye. However, once control of the primary cancer in the eye is lost and the cancer has spread to other areas in the body, the disease is incurable. No adjuvant therapy has demonstrated any survival benefit but dacarbazine is the usual treatment for this patient group. The lack of activity noted to date using both chemotherapy (drugs) and immunotherapy (changing the activity of the immune system) point to an urgent need to investigate novel therapies in this disease. Sunitinib has recently demonstrated major benefits in advanced clear cell carcinoma of the kidney which has doubled the progression free survival period compared to standard therapy. This study plans to investigate whether sunitinib has the potential to increase the progression free survival patients with unresectable good performance metastatic uveal melanoma compared to chemotherapy with current standard treatment, dacarbazine
REC name
North East - Tyne & Wear South Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
10/H0904/15
Date of REC Opinion
17 May 2010
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion