Shame, Guilt, and Risk Behaviours in Forensic Inpatients

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    An examination of the relationship between shame, guilt, and risk behaviours in forensic inpatients

  • IRAS ID

    330856

  • Contact name

    Daniel Whiting

  • Contact email

    Daniel.Whiting@nottingham.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of Nottingham

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 1 months, 7 days

  • Research summary

    This study hopes to find out more about how feelings of shame and guilt might influence individuals’ experiences of risk behaviours, including violence, self-harm, and suicide.

    Some research has found that people who experience high levels of shame are more likely to experience certain difficulties and risk behaviours, such as self-harm (Sheehy et al., 2019). Research has also found that people who experience higher levels of guilt experience less difficulties, such as substance use (Dearing et al., 2005). However, research in this area is limited, and has mostly involved people from the general public.

    Shame and guilt are thought to hold particular significance for individuals who have engaged in offending behaviour (Tangney et al., 2011). Evidence suggests that shame is associated with factors which may increase an individual’s risk of re-offending (Mallion et al., 2020; Sturgess et al., 2015), and guilt with factors which reduce an individual’s risk of re-offending (Fuller et al., 2019; Tangney et al., 2011). Despite this, research into the association between shame, guilt, and risk behaviours within offending populations is limited (Spruit et al., 2016; van Langen et al., 2014).

    The proposed study will investigate the relationship between experiences of shame, guilt, and risk behaviours (specifically violence, self-harm, and suicide), within a forensic population. Individuals living within secure forensic services will be asked to complete two questionnaires which measure their experiences of shame and guilt. These measures will then be correlated with data measuring their engagement in risk behaviours (including violence, self-harm, and suicide), to see if their experience of shame and guilt is associated with their engagement in risk behaviours. This information will help to inform how staff and services support people living in forensic environments, particularly in regard to reducing their experiences of violence, self-harm, and suicide.

  • REC name

    East Midlands - Leicester Central Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    23/EM/0247

  • Date of REC Opinion

    18 Dec 2023

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion