REFINE-B Study

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    REgimen optimisation: Feasibility of sImplifying NucleotidE therapy in HIV/HBV coinfection (REFINE-B study)

  • IRAS ID

    1004892

  • Contact name

    Kosh Agarwal

  • Contact email

    kosh.agarwal@nhs.net

  • Eudract number

    2021-005910-32

  • ISRCTN Number

    ISRCTN11675563

  • Research summary

    People with HIV have traditionally been recommended to take three drugs for adequate control of the virus. However,
    many can now take only two drugs, such as dolutegravir plus lamivudine, without needing a third drug such as
    tenofovir. This carries benefits – both drugs can be combined into one pill daily, with fewer side effects on the kidneys
    than sometimes occur with tenofovir. Taking two drugs is also cheaper than taking a three-drug regimen including the
    new form of tenofovir (TAF). However, people with HIV plus hepatitis B (HBV) have to take tenofovir, or another drug
    called entecavir. This is due to concerns that HBV won’t be treated well enough without this drug being included.
    Using new blood markers for HBV, called pgRNA and HBcrAg, studies have shown we can group patients with HBV
    into those who could stop tenofovir or entecavir and those who should not. Those with undetectable HBV viral load,
    pgRNA and HBcrAg may be able to stop, but if the viral load, pgRNA or HBcrAg is detectable, they should carry on
    tenofovir/entecavir. However, we don’t know yet if this strategy could work in people who have both HIV and HBV
    together.
    This study is a small scale study to evaluate whether or not it is acceptable to reduce the number of drugs for treating
    HIV/HBV in people with undetectable HBV viral load, pgRNA and HBcrAg. We will recruit 12 people who will stop
    tenofovir or entecavir but continue their other antivirals. Individuals will be followed up closely for 6 months, and then
    tenofovir/entecavir will be restarted. We will measure viral markers and liver tests in the blood. If results show the
    strategy to be acceptable, they will help us set up a larger randomised trial to provide more information as to whether
    or not the strategy is effective

  • REC name

    South Central - Berkshire B Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    22/SC/0184

  • Date of REC Opinion

    8 Jul 2022

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion