Reduced-dosed rivaroxaban in the long-term prevention of VTE

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Reduced-dosed rivaroxaban and standard-dosed rivaroxaban versus ASA in the long-term prevention of recurrent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in patients with symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism The Einstein Choice Study

  • IRAS ID

    145981

  • Contact name

    Juliette Dehay

  • Contact email

    juliette.dehay@bayer.com

  • Sponsor organisation

    Bayer HealthCare AG

  • Eudract number

    2013-000619-26

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    NCT02064439

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    2 years, 3 months, 4 days

  • Research summary

    Patients with symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) (blood clots in the leg) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) (blood clots in the lung) who completed 6 to 12 months anticoagulant treatment for their index event will be invited to participate on this study. The purpose of this study is to investigate the best type and dose of blood thinner drugs, aspirin or rivaroxaban in treating patients with blood clots in their legs or lungs. Patients will be randomly given one of the following treatments - Rivaroxaban 20 mg; Rivaroxaban 10 mg; or aspirin enteric coated 100 mg, over a period of 12 months. The study will be double blind, which means neither the patient nor their doctor will know which treatment option the patient is on. The study is also a double dummy study, which means we are using a dummy drug which looks the same as the actual treatment to disguise the treatment the patients are actually receiving. The main objective on this study is to see which treatment, Rivaroxaban 20 mg; Rivaroxaban 10 mg; or aspirin enteric coated 100 mg, will be the best treatment to prevent recurrent blood clots.

    About 2850 patients, from approximately 250 hospitals in approximately 30 countries are anticipated to participate in this study.

  • REC name

    Yorkshire & The Humber - Leeds East Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    14/YH/0092

  • Date of REC Opinion

    1 May 2014

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion