ReAT Project
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Review of children and Adolescent Therapeutic service (ReAT) following endoprosthetic replacements (EPR)
IRAS ID
232499
Contact name
Jaggi Anju
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital
Duration of Study in the UK
0 years, 4 months, 1 days
Research summary
The European and UK guidelines for the management of bone sarcoma make no recommendations on rehabilitation. There is currently no consensus on the rehabilitation of paediatric patients following surgery for primary bone sarcoma.The evidence shows returns to functional activities are impaired and there is variation in survivorship. Participation in physical activity and ADLs are important for preventing or mitigating adverse late effects of childhood cancer, including cardiovascular disease and obesity and are essential for living independently and having a good quality of life.To create a consensus of the rehabilitation we must first determine the realistic functional outcomes following surgery.
The study aims to understand functional expectations following an endoprosthetic replacement due to bone cancer. We are interested in the viewpoints of four groups of people:
• Children and adolescents who have experienced endoprosthetic replacement (aged older than 10 and below 18 at the time of surgery)
• Parents or carers of children and adolescents who have experienced endoprosthetic replacement
• Orthopaedic surgeons performing the surgery
• Implant manufacturersPatients and parents/carers will be identified from clinic lists and interviewed on the same day as their clinic appointment. Patients recruited will have had a diagnosis of primary bone sarcoma and surgery at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, they will have been under the age of 18 years when they had their surgery and a minimum of one year post-operation.
Each participant will carry out one interview with the lead investigator and research assistant (at the same time) about their expectations of functional outcomes following surgery e.g. participation in sport and activities of daily life.
REC name
London - Stanmore Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
18/LO/0069
Date of REC Opinion
2 May 2018
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion