Psychological Therapy for Complex Post-traumatic Stress Disorder

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    What are patient views on psychological therapy for the new diagnosis of Complex Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: a participatory study with service users

  • IRAS ID

    230818

  • Contact name

    Catherine Matheson

  • Contact email

    Catherine.Matheson@slam.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of Exeter

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    2 years, 0 months, 0 days

  • Research summary

    The research aim is to explore the question: What are patient views on psychological therapy for the new diagnosis of Complex Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, CPTSD? The research will be based on interviews by service user researchers with 40 former patients in the London borough of Lewisham. This is a crucial time to answer this question because in 2018, a new diagnosis of Complex PTSD is set to be approved by the World Health Organization. It includes the symptoms of PTSD itself, plus three extra problem areas: finding it hard to control emotions, feeling bad about yourself, and difficulties relating to other people.

    The new diagnosis of CPTSD may apply to people who have experienced extreme traumatic events, such as torture, civil war, organized violence, domestic violence and childhood abuse, and then go on to suffer from the symptoms of PTSD and CPTSD. Psychotherapists and psychologists are currently discussing what might work best with such symptoms.

    Some evidence suggests that it is better to offer patients with CPTSD a three-phase treatment, beginning with ensuring safety & stabilising symptoms, before going on to trauma-focussed therapy, and then working on relationships with others, including family and community. Other evidence suggests patients should be offered trauma-focussed therapy straight away; this involves re-living the trauma and coming to terms with it. We want to know what patients think. The interviews will be carried out by people who have used services themselves.

  • REC name

    London - Westminster Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    17/LO/1391

  • Date of REC Opinion

    12 Sep 2017

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion