Proof of Concept study for GSK249320 versus placebo in Stroke patients
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Study MAG104615, a Proof of Concept Study for GSK249320 versus placebo in Stroke Patients
IRAS ID
120678
Contact name
David Cohen
Sponsor organisation
GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development Ltd
Eudract number
2012-004494-23
ISRCTN Number
n/a
Research summary
This study is to test the safety and efficacy of GSK249320 in patients who have suffered an ischaemic stroke (a stroke caused by a blood clot in the brain). The current main treatment for this kind of stroke must be administered within a few hours after the stroke so can only be used in a small proportion of cases. GSK249320 is a monoclonal antibody which works by blocking a protein in the body called MAG. MAG stops nerve growth after a stroke so by blocking it, nerve growth after a stroke might increase. This may be helpful for treating stroke in the future. This drug has so far been tested in 2 human studies. It has been given to 25 stroke patients in one study and to 31 healthy volunteers in another to test its safety. This study will include up to 162 participants in 4 countries and is sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline.Eligible participants will be between 18-90 years old and must have had a stroke within the last 24-72 hours. They must also have problems with their lower limb function as a result of their stroke.Participants will be given either GSK249320 or placebo (a plain salt water solution), in addition to standard care. This will be given through a drip into a vein in the arm on study days 1 and 6. Participants will then be assessed every 30 days for 3 months and again at 6 months. A follow-up visit may be required later.Assessments will include vital signs (heat rate, breathing rate), ECG, blood samples and other specialised tests. These will include tests for hand movement, coordination and walking. A CT or MRI scan may be required at the first visit and an MRI scan of the brain will be required at the 6 month visit.
REC name
London - Harrow Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
13/LO/0157
Date of REC Opinion
18 Mar 2013
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion