PINCER
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Platform study for solid organ cancer
IRAS ID
343963
Contact name
Dale Vimalachandran
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
University of Liverpool
Duration of Study in the UK
10 years, 0 months, 0 days
Research summary
Solid organ cancers remain a significant healthcare problem. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment for many patients but this often fails to secure long term control and is often associated with significant effects on quality of life and function. Recent developments have encouragingly revealed that more specific treatment aimed at the biology of the disease can be much more effective and, in some cases, reduce or even obviate the need for major surgery. However, much more work remains to be done and the UK and in particular, the Northwest remain significant negative outliers when it comes to cancer outcomes.
There remains a clear and urgent need to better understand the biology of cancer and in particular understand the response of the disease to treatment options both in the short and long term. The proposed study builds on two existing studies to provide researchers with rapid access to biosamples (e.g. blood, tissue, urine etc) from patients undergoing treatment for solid organ cancers (e.g. bowel, breast, bladder, lung, head and neck, pelvic, gynaecological etc.).
Patients will be asked to provide consent to access surplus tissue/blood taken as part of their normal care but may be asked to provide additional samples prior to, during or after treatment (separate and specific funding will be obtained when samples are provided at additional timepoints to standard of care sampling). Samples will be taken only to answer specific research questions from scientific (academic or commercial) collaborators and will be used to generate pilot/feasibility data to allow a full study to be developed. Such a study would require its own funding and ethical application; the PINCER study exists solely to allow the rapid and agile collection of tissue to generate the necessary pilot data to decide whether a scientific line of enquiry is worth pursuing.REC name
East of England - Essex Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
24/EE/0138
Date of REC Opinion
12 Jun 2024
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion