Performance Evaluation of New X-Ray Cabinet - The Cirdan Solas
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Intraoperative Imaging - Performance Evaluation of the Cirdan Solas against a currently used x-ray device
IRAS ID
288622
Contact name
Aaron Peace
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
Cirdan
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier
NA, NA
Duration of Study in the UK
1 years, 2 months, 12 days
Research summary
The following proposal shall be used to determine the quality of the Cirdan Solas compared with the leading competitor product for the examination of surgical breast specimens.
NOTE: The proposed protocol shall minimise disruption to the normal procedure and workflow for the intraoperative examination of lumpectomies since the specimen will be imaged in the standard device first thus providing the surgeon with information on the specimen as normal. Only after this is achieved will the specimen be imaged in the Cirdan system.
Step 1
Cirdan Solas unit is placed close to the standard imaging device (Faxitron BioVision):
No patient data is required
automatically capture multiple images of the same specimen at different KV and exposure settings – this will speed up the image acquisition process while acquiring a comprehensive image set for each specimen.Step 2
For an agreed number of specimens
NHS staff shall operate and acquire images of the specimen using their standard imaging device (Faxitron BioVision).
Cirdan would also like to capture information regarding the usability of the Faxitron such as
i.The time taken to initially calibrate the system
ii.In use, the number of actions/clicks required to operate, and time taken to complete the imaging
Immediately NHS staff shall then transfer the specimen to the Solas system. The desired outcome is to have a representative set of images from both the stand-of-care device and the Cirdan system to analyse and compare at a later time.Step 3
Cirdan shall initially analyse images:
To ensure they are properly corrected and reconstructed
To record the settings (such as KV, exposure etc.) of the acquired images that are optimal for image qualityStep 4
A brief review of the image sets from each device involving Cirdan staff and a Radiologist to:
form an opinion on the Solas performance compared with the Faxitron
confirm the identify the best settings of the Solas unit
ascertain if other changes are required such as post-processing.REC name
West of Scotland REC 1
REC reference
20/WS/0158
Date of REC Opinion
5 Nov 2020
REC opinion
Unfavourable Opinion