Patella denervation in total knee arthroplasty

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Patella denervation with circumferencial diathermy in total knee arthroplasty: A randomised controlled trial.

  • IRAS ID

    48186

  • Contact name

    Bilal Jamal

  • Contact email

    bjamal@doctors.org.uk

  • Research summary

    Summary of Results

    Methods
    We conducted a single centre double blind randomised controlled trial. Patients aged 40 years or older and booked to undergo a total knee arthroplasty were recruited from a single centre. All patients underwent total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing. Participants were blinded to treatment allocation. There was no cross-over. The primary outcome was Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 1-year post-operatively. Secondary outcomes were Bartlett Patella Score, WOMAC, SF-12. Linear regression analysis was performed with adjustment by age, sex, and baseline (pre-operative) scores.

    Results
    142 participants were recruited of which 49 patients (35%) were randomised to the denervation intervention. The mean patient age was 71-years and 51% (74/142) were female. No difference in OKS was detected at 1-year (mean difference [MD] 1.87; 95% CI -1.28 to 5.03). No difference was detected in Bartlett Patella Score (MD 0.490; 95% CI -1.61 to 2.59) or SF-12 (MD 0.196; 95% CI -2.54 to 2.93). A statistically significant difference in WOMAC was detected but at a level less than the minimal clinically important difference for WOMAC (MD 4.79; 95% CI 1.05 to 8.52) and at 2-years, no significant difference was observed in any of the outcome measures.

    Conclusion
    No clinically important benefit was detected from patella rim electrocautery in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing (including no benefit in terms of post-TKA anterior knee pain). This treatment is therefore not recommended for clinical practice.

  • REC name

    West of Scotland REC 1

  • REC reference

    13/WS/0033

  • Date of REC Opinion

    21 Mar 2013

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion