Participants experiences of living with frozen shoulder
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Participants experiences of living with frozen shoulder: A qualitative review
IRAS ID
274953
Contact name
Christine Bilsborough Smith
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust
Duration of Study in the UK
years, 2 months, days
Research summary
Research Summary
A common cause of shoulder pain is a gradual stiffening of the shoulder known as frozen shoulder and affects between 2-5% of the population. Activities of daily living, such as dressing, attending to personal hygiene are often associated with substantial pain and morbidity, with some leaving work due to the symptoms.
The causes of frozen shoulder are poorly understood, however it appears to be more common in people with diabetes. Frozen shoulder typically goes through two stages. Stage 1: pain greater than stiffness and stage 2: stiffness greater than pain. In stage 2, research has demonstrated some benefit for exercise and physiotherapy in the management of frozen shoulder.
The study aims are:
• To explore participants experiences of living with frozen shoulder in terms of symptoms, obtaining a diagnosis and receiving management.
• To explore the impact the condition has on social and occupational factors
• How the patients were involved in shared decision makingEligibility criteria
• A primary diagnosis of idiopathic or secondary systemic (associated with diabetes) frozen shoulder who have been referred by their GP, orthopaedic consultant or similar qualified healthcare professional.
Method
A single semi-structured interview, lasting no more than 60 minutes, will be conducted at a location agreed with the participant. Either at the participants home, a patient interview room within the community hospital setting or via teleconference.*
Potential participants will be identified via the NHS community musculoskeletal pathway for patients with frozen shoulder and will have completed their episode of care. This is an established care pathway for frozen shoulder within Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust in the London Borough of Barnet. Patients are referred by their GP, orthopaedic consultant or other appropriate healthcare professional with an initial diagnosis of frozen shoulder. This is a single site study.
*Dependent upon current COVID situation.
Summary of Results
Frozen shoulder is a disabling condition characterised by severe pain and loss of shoulder movement and may affect up to 5% of the population. Qualitative research documents debilitating pain and how treatment to reduce pain is a priority for people diagnosed with frozen shoulder. Corticosteroid injections are a principal treatment to reduce the pain of frozen shoulder, however little is known about the patient experience.
Objectives
This study aims to address this gap in the knowledge by exploring the lived experience of people with frozen shoulder who have undergone an injection and to highlight other novel findings.Design
This is a qualitative study using interpretative phenomenological analysis. One-to-one, semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven people diagnosed with frozen shoulder who had received a corticosteroid injection as part of their management.Methodology
A purposive sample of participants were interviewed via MSTeamsTM due to Covid-19 restrictions. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed in accordance with interpretive phenomenological analysis methodsResults
Three group experiential themes were identified: the dilemma surrounding injections; the challenges of understanding the causes of frozen shoulder; the impact on self and others.Conclusion
Participants conveyed a strong desire in seeking a corticosteroid injection whilst seemingly dismissing the risks. A novel concept was illuminated as frozen shoulder seemed inextricably linked with the ageing process, which negatively impacted body-image. The impact on others is driven by a sense of the unfamiliar nature of illness and it is incumbent on healthcare professionals to seek opportunities to explore the individual’s beliefs.REC name
South Central - Oxford C Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
20/SC/0278
Date of REC Opinion
21 Aug 2020
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion