Parkinson's pen project 1

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Developing a novel non-invasive aid for early diagnosis of Parkinson's disease: A feasibility study

  • IRAS ID

    146247

  • Contact name

    Richard Walker

  • Contact email

    richard.walker@nhct.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

  • Research summary

    Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive, degenerative condition that affects movement. Subjective, handwriting examinations are commonly performed in the analysis of PD during clinical assessment. The Manus platform (developed by Manus Neurodynamica Ltd, Newcastle upon Tyne) is a novel sensor system that uses automated mathematical methods, integrated with a digital pen, that may assist with making a diagnosis in cases where a clear diagnosis cannot be made by a specialist physician. Sensors in the platform analyse movement of the pen, the hand and pen-hand interaction during a series of simple drawing and writing tasks. Levels of performance in these tasks allow a diagnosis to be made. The overall objective of this project is assessing the usefulness of the novel system for differentiating between PD and other diagnoses, such as essential tremor within the ‘real world’ clinical setting.
    Current best practice for diagnosis of PD is expert clinical opinion or, in cases of doubt, DaTSCAN. DaTSCAN is expensive, requires specialist training to use and can be an unpleasant experience for patients.

    Over two years, we will recruit 101 people, referred to NHS PD services in North-East England, who are thought to have PD and who consent to participate. The study will be coordinated from Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. Assessment will be at one of the Trust's hospitals or at home if patients are unwilling or unable to travel. Those who do not have the capacity to consent due to cognitive impairment or other health problems will be excluded. If they consent, the spouses of those referred will also be assessed to provide further information on the system's accuracy. We will compare the diagnosis based on use of the platform to that obtained by current ‘best practice’. An accuracy of 90% sensitivity and 80% specificity is aimed for.

  • REC name

    North East - York Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    14/NE/1037

  • Date of REC Opinion

    24 Jul 2014

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion