Pacemaker dependency, cardiac symptoms & QOL in dualchamber pacemakers
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Exploring the relationship between Pacemaker dependency, cardiac symptoms and the perceived quality of life in patients with implanted dual-chamber pacemakers
IRAS ID
139105
Contact name
Kerry J Clarke
Contact email
Duration of Study in the UK
0 years, 4 months, 1 days
Research summary
Aim:
To determine if a relationship exists between how much a patient uses their pacemaker,their Quality of Life and heart symptoms when they have a dual chamber pacemaker implanted. Background: A pacemaker is a device that is recommended when a patient has a heart rate that is too slow and/or the patient experiences symptoms such as blackouts, dizziness and tiredness. Many previous studies have compared the benefits of single chamber pacemakers versus dual chamber devices but there is less evidence in the literature that focuses solely on dual chamber devices. Each patient relies on their pacemaker different amounts.The pacemaker makes sure that the top and bottom chambers of the heart work in synchrony if the patients' own heart is unable to do this. It has been shown in previous studies that pacemaker implant alone improves quality of life. However, it is not known if there is a link between how much a patient relies on their pacemaker and their quality of life and heart symptoms. Methods:
A cross-sectional study will use QoL questionnaire SF-36 and symptom questionnaire Aquarel in patients with dual chamber pacemakers . Pacemaker data required for the study will be collected when the patient attends for routine checks. The information being collected for the study is part of the patients routine care. Apart from the questionnaires nothing is being added or left out from the patients routine check. As the patient is already attending for their check-up the impact on patient time is minimal.
Outcomes:
An improved knowledge and understanding between how much a patient relies on their pacemaker and how they perceive their quality of life and heart symptoms. A better insight into what patients can expect with regards to QoL and symptoms can be gained thus allowing improved patient information and education.REC name
North West - Liverpool Central Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
15/NW/0552
Date of REC Opinion
8 Jul 2015
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion