Outcomes of calf DVTs not treated with anticoagulants

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Outcomes of calf deep vein thromboses not treated with anticoagulants: a cohort study

  • IRAS ID

    227887

  • Contact name

    Michelle Bonfield

  • Contact email

    Michelle.Bonfield@UHBristol.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 11 months, 28 days

  • Research summary

    A deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a blood clot that forms in the veins. This can occur in the veins of the leg and may be above knee or below knee (calf). Treatment of above knee clots using blood thinners is an agreed standard however treatment of calf clots is still controversial, particularly with regard to the risk of bleeding versus the risk of having a clot. Protocol at UHBristol has recently changed from routinely treating calf DVTs with blood thinners to rescanning patients after one week to check for extension.

    This project is a cohort study looking at the outcomes of these untreated calf DVT patients three months after their initial diagnosis. The potential outcomes of a calf DVT include the clot getting bigger (propagation), the clot going away (resolution), part of the clot travelling to the lungs (pulmonary embolism, PE), the development long term symptoms (post thrombotic syndrome, PTS) and recurrence of the DVT. These outcomes will be assessed by inviting participants to a rescan of their leg veins three months after their initial diagnosis. At this visit they will also have a clinical examination of their leg and take part in a questionnaire about their symptoms and quality of life.

    The results from this cohort study and a brief questionnaire carried out at the Society of Vascular Technology annual meeting focusing on how people are treated at other NHS hospitals will be used to decide whether a larger trial should be carried out to find out what the best care plan might be for these patients.

  • REC name

    London - Central Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    17/LO/1767

  • Date of REC Opinion

    13 Oct 2017

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion