OlympiAD - Olaparib monotherapy V Physicians choice chemotherapy
Research type
Research Study
Full title
A Phase III, Open Label, Randomised, Controlled, Multi-centre Study to assess the efficacy and Safety of Olaparib Monotherapy versus Physicians Choice Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients with germline BRCA1/2 Mutations
IRAS ID
148426
Contact name
Anne Armstrong
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
AstraZenecaAB
Eudract number
2013-005137-20
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier
Research summary
Breast cancer is a life-threatening disease and is the second leading cause of cancer death among women. In the general population, BRCA mutation (Breast cancer susceptibility gene) carriers have an increased risk of breast cancer. There are no approved treatments for patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations and these patients are treated according to their hormone receptor and HER2 status.
Metastatic breast cancer is an incurable malignancy with a median survival of 20 to 24 months in unselected populations.
Olaparib is an oral therapy being developed to treat patients with BRCA 1/2 mutations. Olaparib works by blocking particular chemicals called PARP enzymes. This is a new way to fight tumours with cells that cannot repair themselves properly. Tumours in patients with BRCA 1/2 are known to be sensitive to PARP blockers. This study will investigate whether giving oral Olaparib,to patients with BRCA mutated metastatic breast cancer, will have an effect on increasing the disease free time interval, when compared to Physicians choice of treatment of either capecitabine, vinorelbine or eribulin.
Two thirds of the patients recruited will be randomly selected to receive Olaparib and the other third will receive Physicians choice of either capecitabine, vinorelbine or eribulin. After giving consent to take part, patients will attend regular hospital visits throughout the study. The number of study visits will depend on factors such as patients tolerance to treatment and time to disease progression. Disease progression will be assessed by CT scans at regular intervals throughout the study. Patients who discontinue study treatment and/or receive a subsequent therapy prior to disease progression will still continue to have CT scans as per study schedule until disease progression. Following confirmed disease progression, patients may be allowed to continue study treatment if the Study Physician and AZ Physician agree that the patient could continue to receive benefit.REC name
North West - Liverpool Central Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
14/NW/0156
Date of REC Opinion
14 Apr 2014
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion