Non-interventional study to investigate patterns of use of Selincro®

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Non-interventional multi-country prospective cohort study to investigate patterns of use of Selincro® and frequency of adverse drug reactions in routine clinical practice

  • IRAS ID

    157450

  • Contact name

    Jonathan D. Chick

  • Contact email

    jonathan.chick@gmail.com

  • Sponsor organisation

    Lundbeck SAS

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    ENCEPP/SDPP/5678, EU PAS register number

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    2 years, 9 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    Selincro® has received a positive opinion from the European Commission. A Post-Authorisation Safety Study (PASS) has been proposed to investigate patterns of use of Selincro® and frequency of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) of special interest in patients treated with Selincro® in routine clinical practice. The PASS will take into account the important risks and missing information documented in the Risk Management Plan (RMP) in order to inform and potentially refine pharmacovigilance planning and risk management for Selincro® and to assess the compliance to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC).

    The main objectives are consequently to describe:
    - the patterns of use of Selincro® in routine clinical practice, taking into account the important risks and missing information documented in the Selincro® RMP,
    - the frequency of Adverse Drug Reactions of special interest in patients treated with Selincro® in routine clinical practice in the entire study population and in the subpopulations of interest.

    The study will enrol 2000 patients in approximately 10 countries. These patients are those diagnosed with alcohol dependence who have a high drinking risk level, without physical withdrawal symptoms and who do not require immediate detoxification.

  • REC name

    Yorkshire & The Humber - Leeds West Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    14/YH/1186

  • Date of REC Opinion

    11 Dec 2014

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion