New radiological classification for pulmonary embolism - Version 1

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A new combined radiological and clinical classification for pulmonary embolism using computed tomography pulmonary angiography.

  • IRAS ID

    163208

  • Contact name

    Rachel Chubsey

  • Contact email

    v1a83@students.keele.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Keele University

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    14/YH1270,

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 6 months, 30 days

  • Research summary

    Due to the difficult diagnosis and subsequent management of pulmonary embolism(PE), (which is a blood clot found in the blood vessels of the lungs), there is a need for clearer classification of the disease on radiological imaging. I propose to research and create a new classification system for pulmonary embolism (PE), diagnosed on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA). A CTPA is a scan which looks in detail at the blood vessels in the thorax to determine the presence of clot. The aim is for the classification system to show a relationship with the patient’s immediate clinical presentation which can subsequently be used to direct treatment.
    A group of 50-100 patients who were diagnosed with a PE on CTPA, at the Royal Stoke University Hospital will be collected. A search of the radiology database CRIS will be conducted and those patients with a massive pulmonary embolism will be included, provided they fit the strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The radiology images, reports and patient notes of the selected group will be anonymised and data collected. Once analysed a new classification will be created from the images taken and any other relevant patient investigations such as, heart rate, blood pressure, biochemical markers and electrocardiograph findings. This will allow a holistic approach to be taken when creating the criteria ensuring many aspects of the patients' presentation and clinical state are included.
    The aim is for the new classification to be fit for use in clinical practice and to aid the direction of patient treatment and follow up long term.

  • REC name

    Yorkshire & The Humber - Bradford Leeds Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    14/YH/1270

  • Date of REC Opinion

    28 Nov 2014

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion