MUK one

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    An open label, multi-centre, randomised, parallel group phase II selection trial to identify the optimal starting dose of bendamustine (60 vs 100 mg/m2) when given in combination with thalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

  • IRAS ID

    55791

  • Contact name

    Steve Schey

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of Leeds

  • Eudract number

    2010-021451-12

  • ISRCTN Number

    ISRCTN90889843

  • Research summary

    Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell tumour that is currently incurable. Every year, almost 4,000 new cases of multiple myeloma are diagnosed in the UK, equivalent to approximately 1% of all cancers. Median survival has improved incrementally since the introduction of alkylating agents. However the outlook for patients relapsing after optimal therapy remains poor and patients with disease refractory to initial treatments have an especially poor prognosis. Bendamustine hydrochloride is an alkylating anti-tumour agent with unique activity. Research has shown that high-dose bendamustine followed by stem cell support may be a feasible treatment for heavily pre-treated patients, including patients pre-treated with the newer therapeutic agents (e.g. thalidomide, lenalidomide, bortezomib) and not eligible for or refractory to high-dose melphalan; even in progressive disease.This study aims to identify whether bendamustine, when combined with thalidomide and dexamethasone is suffinciently active and tolerable for further investigation. The study also aims to identify the most efficacious and best tolerated dose of bendamustine when combined with thalidomide and dexamethasone (BTD) in relapsed/refractory MM. The findings of this study may then inform further phase III studies of BTD vs. current standard treatment with a novel agent in combination with an alkylating agent, in the de novo setting.

  • REC name

    London - Dulwich Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    10/H0808/129

  • Date of REC Opinion

    30 Sep 2010

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion