MANDARIN study

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Comparison of devices for the detection of diabetic neuropathy; an evaluative diagnostic study. (short title: ‘MANDARIN’ , Medipin Assessment for Neuropathy in Diabetes, A Real-world INvestigation)

  • IRAS ID

    325532

  • Contact name

    Stacey Fisher

  • Contact email

    stacey.fisher@ncic.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust

  • ISRCTN Number

    ISRCTN85524728

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    MANDARIN1, MANDARIN study

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 0 months, 31 days

  • Research summary

    Nerve damage and loss of protective sensation (LOPS) is a complication of diabetes. This diabetic neuropathy (DN) can subsequently lead to further complications such as diabetic foot ulcers and even amputation of toes and lower limbs. It is therefore essential to monitor for the development of DN in diabetic patients. In standard clinical practice DN is checked for using a monofilament, a piece of nylon on a stick that is pushed onto the patient’s foot; LOPS is the sign of DN having developed. Monofilament testing checks for damage to large nerve fibres. There is however evidence that small nerve fibres are damaged before the large nerves are affected. Using a practical, reliable, and simple tool to check for small nerve damage in a clinic setting may aid in detecting LOPS/DN earlier and optimising patient management. Medipin is a hygienic single-use device designed to check for small nerve fibre damage in feet. The main objective of this study is to determine how many patients have LOPS/DN when tested with the monofilament and Medipin device respectively and to what degree there is an overlap between the two tests. For this purpose a total of 139 patients will be assessed at a single clinic visit.

  • REC name

    West Midlands - Coventry & Warwickshire Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    23/WM/0095

  • Date of REC Opinion

    25 Apr 2023

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion