Lynch syndrome-the assessment of identification at MDT
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Lynch syndrome – the assessment of identification at MDT and exploring clonal diversity and evolution
IRAS ID
207917
Contact name
CHUKWUEMEKA ANELE
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
Research and development team, Central Middlesex, Northwick Park and St Marks Hospitals
Duration of Study in the UK
2 years, 0 months, 1 days
Research summary
Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common inherited cause of colorectal cancer (CRC). It accounts for 3-5% of CRC and also predisposes to cancers at other sites such as uterus, ovary and stomach. LS is caused by mutations in the genes responsible for repairing faulty DNA. LS individuals also have a high risk of developing another CRC a few years after surgery for index CRC.
Traditionally, specialised screening for LS is performed on resected specimen in CRC patients who fulfill specific criteria. There are few/no data to assess the reliability of this method of testing in other specimens such as preoperative diagnostic biopsies or lymph nodes and metastasis in advanced disease.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a risk factor for colorectal cancer. Many of these cases, due to their young age will fulfill the criteria for testing for LS. MMR IHC is often not performed as it is assumed that the CRC is IBD related. There are few/no data to assess coexistence of the two conditions.
There will be two parts to the study:
1) Retrospective analysis of archived tissue specimens of lynch syndrome CRC. These will include: resected CRC specimen, lymph nodes and metastatic tissues from advanced CRC and pre and post chemo- radiotherapy specimen. Mismatch repair immunohistochemistry (MMR IHC) will be performed on these tissue comparing:
• Diagnostic biopsies vs Resected specimen
• Lymph node vs Metastasis vs Resected specimen
• Pre and post chemo-radiotherapy specimens of LS individuals2) MMR IHC on all IBD CRC which fulfil Bethesda criteria to test for Lynch syndrome
The benefit of this research is to enhance our ability to diagnose LS. This may improve surgical decision making and patient autonomy with regards to extent of bowel resection (limited/extended), prevent invasive investigations and influence oncological treatment.
REC name
London - Brent Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
16/LO/1857
Date of REC Opinion
9 Dec 2016
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion