Low FODMAP diet group vs. individual education: pilot study

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Delivering advice regarding a diet low in fermentable, short-chain carbohydrates (low FODMAP diet) in a group vs. individual setting: a pilot study

  • IRAS ID

    170489

  • Contact name

    Lee Hooper

  • Contact email

    L.Hooper@uea.ac.uk

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 7 months, 24 days

  • Research summary

    This research study aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a study to identify which setting for delivering dietary advice to patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is more effective. The research is designed to compare two settings; group education sessions vs. individual clinic appointments and evaluate the relative impact on IBS symptoms, compare patient-reported satisfaction/experience and above all, patient acceptability. Feasibility data from this pilot study can be used to perform a power calculation as well as ensure feasibility of design for large scale research.

    The dietary advice delivered in both settings educates patients on their condition and how to follow a diet low in fermentable, short-chain carbohydrates (a "low FODMAP diet"). This is a second-line dietary intervention to help manage IBS symptoms currently delivered in a clinic setting only. There is currently no formal research which compares efficacy between settings on patient-reported outcomes.

    Participants will be asked to rate their own severity of symptoms before the dietary education and again at 6 weeks upon implementing the diet. They will also be asked to complete a questionnaire which evaluates their experience and satisfaction with their (dietary) treatment immediately after the education session/clinic appointment.

    The results of this study will help develop services within secondary care to IBS patients locally, and may contribute to future national guidance.

  • REC name

    North West - Greater Manchester West Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    15/NW/0136

  • Date of REC Opinion

    10 Feb 2015

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion