JaW PrinT

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Jaw reconstruction with printed or flexed titanium and free tissue transfer.

  • IRAS ID

    237354

  • Contact name

    Alexander Goodson

  • Contact email

    alex.goodson@southwales.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of South Wales

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    2 years, 6 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    JaW PrinT is a prospective observational study, designed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and economics of two routinely performed surgical approaches/pathways for mandibular (lower jaw) reconstruction. Mandibular reconstruction is required immediately following removal of a diseased segment of the lower jaw (e.g. for cancer, radiotherapy damage or benign tumours). There are two techniques in routine use, both involve the use of a segment of the fibula bone (from the lower leg) to replace the removed piece of diseased jaw bone, along with a customised titanium plate and screws to hold the bones in place until the new jaw heals together. The difference between the two pathways/techniques relates to the way in which the plate has been fabricated. One plate is first manufactured as a solid titanium plate and then flexed and customised to the shape of the new jaw, prior to the surgery. The other plate is manufactured by a different technique; from powdered titanium which is then melted into the planned jaw shape. The two different plates are standard/routine treatment at the Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board (and at other Oral and Maxillofacial centres worldwide) and are entirely transferrable, with identical indications for clinical use. The two require slight differences in surgical technique (specifically the sequence in which screw holes are drilled and screws placed), with no clear benefit or disadvantage of either approach. It is the difference in the overall surgical treatment pathways that we would like to evaluate: i.e. the implications upon placement of the fibula bone through either surgical technique. Primarily we aim to evaluate the accuracy of the actual jaw bone reconstruction in comparison to the planned reconstruction as well as secondary 'quality of life' measures, using data that is in the main, available from routine clinical tests performed before and after surgery.

  • REC name

    Wales REC 2

  • REC reference

    17/WA/0398

  • Date of REC Opinion

    18 Dec 2017

  • REC opinion

    Unfavourable Opinion