“Its not pain its discomfort“ an investigation

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    An experimental review of if discomfort exists and can be measured independently of pain in a chronic pain and non-pain population

  • IRAS ID

    110396

  • Contact name

    Nicholas Harland

  • Contact email

    nick.harland@nhs.net

  • Sponsor organisation

    South Tees NHS Hospitals Foundation Trust

  • Research summary

    Currently ’pain’ and ’discomfort’ are clinically reported and used interchangeably with very common questionnaires; like the EQ5D used internationally across many populations asking about “Pain and Discomfort“. Subjectively however many chronic musculoskeletal pain patients clinically report “Its not pain, its discomfort“ indicating that discomfort as a measurable descriptor could exist and be independent of pain.

    In a clinical chronic musculoskeletal pain population the study aims to separately but concurrently measure pain and discomfort using Visual Analogue scales (VAS). The measurement scales will be sent to musculoskeletal physiotherapy patients by post or to discharged patients that have expressed an interest in being involved in research in the past.

    Additionally, in a lab situation using the common method of controlled and measured thumb nail pressure, using an Algometer, the study again aims to concurrently measure, using VAS scales, pain and discomfort scores with incrementally increasing thumbnail pressure. This lab based technique will also be performed in a non-pain population sample for comparison.

    Qualitatively the overall issue of pain reporting and the potential willingness of participants to report discomfort rather than pain either verbally or in self-reort questionnaires will be discussed. Interviews will be held with chronic musculoskeletal pain patients and with a non-pain population sample.

  • REC name

    North East - Tyne & Wear South Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    13/NE/0202

  • Date of REC Opinion

    22 Aug 2013

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion