Isometric vs. Isotonic exercise for greater trochanteric pain syndrome

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Isometric versus Isotonic exercise for greater trochanteric pain syndrome - a randomised controlled trial comparing two rehabilitation programmes

  • IRAS ID

    225501

  • Contact name

    Christopher Clifford

  • Contact email

    chris.clifford@ggc.scot.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    NHS GG+C

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    NCT03145233

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 6 months, 0 days

  • Research summary

    Pain at the side of the hip over or around the greater trochanter of the femur has previously been termed as Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS). Recent research has found that it is normally due to the gluteal tendons being torn or injured and is often termed as ‘gluteal tendinopathy’.

    GTPS predominantly affects adults aged 40-60 years and is the second most common condition affecting the hip region after osteoarthritis. Quality of life scores are similar to those with advanced hip osteoarthritis but despite its prevalence and disease burden the most effective treatment for this problem is currently unknown.

    Numerous studies have shown that exercise programmes are the most effective treatment for other lower limb tendon problems, particularly the Achilles and patella. These programmes typically last a minimum of 12 weeks and are often prescribed by physiotherapists as first-line treatment. However, there is currently limited evidence to support exercise for gluteal tendinopathy. We plan to directly compare two different types of exercise programmes for those with GTPS for a period of 12 weeks. One group will receive an isometric exercise programme (where the muscle length does not change) and a second group an isotonic exercise programme (where the muscle length does change) .

    The primary outcome measure which we will use has recently been validated for patients with gluteal tendinopathy and measures function and disability. Additional secondary outcome measures will evaluate aspects relating to quality of life, physical activity and pain. Both groups will be compared at the start of the study and at different times up to a maximum of 12 weeks to help determine if one exercise programme is better than the other.

    The results of this pilot study will also help to identify whether a larger trial would be possible in the future.

  • REC name

    West of Scotland REC 4

  • REC reference

    17/WS/0110

  • Date of REC Opinion

    13 Jun 2017

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion