INHIBITING AND FACILITATING FACTORS FOR SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIOUR V1

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    EXPLORING INHIBITING AND FACILITATING FACTORS FOR SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIOUR IN FORENSIC PSYCHIATRIC CARE: DEVELOPING THE SIMBA FOR CLINICAL RECORD REVIEW

  • IRAS ID

    328873

  • Contact name

    Jane L Ireland

  • Contact email

    JLIreland1@uclan.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Research and Development

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 5 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    There has been limited use of assessments focusing on both inhibiting and facilitating factors for self-harm. Furthermore, there have been limitations noted in the risk assessment tools designed to predict risk, for the same reason. The present study attempts to address the gap in the literature by further developing a tool capturing facilitating and inhibiting factors for self-injurious behaviour. This tool (SIMBA – Self-Injurious Management of Behaviour Assessment) is based on a narrative literature review that identified facilitating and inhibiting factors relevant to a secure population, and was able to take advantage of a series of interviews and functional assessments conducted with forensic patients, as part of earlier research.

    The SIMBA consists of 20 facilitating and seven inhibiting factors, but is yet to be validated. The current study is aiming to achieve this by examining the presence of these 20 factors through a review of patient clinical records. It will not require any measures being completed by patients, just access to their records. Underpinning this is the importance of developing a means of reviewing patients records for relevant factors that do not move the burden to a patient when they are in a period of elevated distress. Thus, the SIMBA is being prepared as a record review-based assessment to assist clinical teams and support with their care and risk management plans.

  • REC name

    Social Care REC

  • REC reference

    23/IEC08/0031

  • Date of REC Opinion

    9 Oct 2023

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion