Impact of stoma for constipation

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Evaluating complications, symptom improvement and quality of life after stoma in patients with chronic functional constipation

  • IRAS ID

    180991

  • Contact name

    Fareed Iqbal

  • Contact email

    Fareed.iqbal@nhs.net

  • Sponsor organisation

    The London Northwest Healthcare NHS Trust

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 0 months, 6 days

  • Research summary

    Constipation is common as almost everyone has been affected at some stage in their life. Some patients have symptoms that persist for longer requiring ongoing treatment. Without treatment quality of life in these people can be severely hampered. Treatments such as laxatives and bowel re-training programs called Biofeedback help the majority. However a small proportion of patients have ongoing symptoms. Treating these patients effectively is extremely challenging. There are no treatments available for this group. In some cases, a stoma is the only option. This is when a part of the bowel is brought onto the surface of the tummy allowing movement of bowel content into a bag. The impact of living with a stoma for other reasons like bowel cancer and inflammatory bowel disease has been researched well. Stomas made for chronic constipation has been researched less well.
    This research project aims to evaluate previously recorded surgical data alongside data collected from postal questionnaires and interviews, the direct impact of a stoma in patients with chronic constipation. It also wishes to evaluate whether symptoms are improved and whether the procedure offers any improvement to quality of life.
    This research will help doctors and nurses who care for patients with constipation appreciate the influence a stoma on quality of life. This will allow for better patient selection in future cases.

  • REC name

    West Midlands - South Birmingham Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    15/WM/0174

  • Date of REC Opinion

    16 Jun 2015

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion