How reliable are respiratory rate measurements in children

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Inter-observer variation in the measurement of respiratory rate in children

  • IRAS ID

    205102

  • Contact name

    Heather Elphick

  • Contact email

    heather.elphick@sch.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Sheffield Childrens NHS Foundation Trust

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 6 months, 31 days

  • Research summary

    The breathing rate of a child is an important sign that is measured by both nurses and doctors when a child is admitted to hospital and subsequently during their stay. Breathing rate gives a good assessment of how sick a child is and what immediate care is needed. The healthcare professional will usually use suitable devices to check the other vital signs, such as body temperature, pulse rate and blood oxygen levels. However, the breathing rate has to be manually counted (this is the average number of breaths taken each minute).

    As the measurement of breathing rate is a subjective assessment there is a possibility that there could be a difference in measurements if two different people were to take the breathing rate of the same child at the same time. If the measurements obtained vary between individuals then this has implications on the assessment of the child as being well or unwell and the subsequent management they receive.

    We will study the differences in respiratory rate measurements taken by 3 different observers on the same child within a 2 hour period as well as a questionnaire based assessment of respiratory rate from video recordings of children breathing.

    Through this study we can advise on how accurate breathing rate measurements are between different healthcare professionals and if any variation affects children being admitted sooner and receiving important treatment promptly.

  • REC name

    Yorkshire & The Humber - South Yorkshire Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    16/YH/0262

  • Date of REC Opinion

    12 Jul 2016

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion