HLA antibodies following blood transfusion

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    HLA antibodies following blood transfusion in renal transplant recipients

  • IRAS ID

    183917

  • Contact name

    Becky Ward

  • Contact email

    becky.ward@imperial.ac.uk

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 0 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    HLA (Human leucocyte) antigens are present on most of the cells in your body. People inherit HLA antigens (or type) from their parents. Antibodies against these HLA antigens are made by the immune system following exposure to somebody else’s HLA antigens, for example after blood transfusion and pregnancy.
    Following transplantation, patients can develop HLA antibodies directed against the HLA antigens from the kidney donor, called donor specific antibodies (DSA). Following DSA development, patients are at risk of rejection and transplant failure. As such, mechanisms to limit the development of HLA antibodies ‘sensitisation’ is extremely important in patients pre and post transplantation.
    In a retrospective study of patients transplanted at Imperial College NHS Trust, 18.3% of patients developed DSA. We found an association between receiving a blood transfusion after transplant and increased risk of developing DSA. Why this occurs is the basis of our study. We wish to HLA type the blood donors and see whether DSA to the kidney graft is more likely to occur if the blood donor and kidney donor share HLA antigens foreign to the recipient.
    If an association between blood transfusion and DSA development is shown then methods to try and circumvent foreign HLA antigen load during transfusion will be vital in order to try and improve transplant longevity. Such interventions will include blood salvage techniques and the use of erythropoietin, both of which should be in place in any active transplant programme. However a positive correlation could mean that HLA matched blood, that is the HLA type of the blood donor and transplant recipient should be identical, could be made the best standard of care.

  • REC name

    North West - Liverpool Central Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    15/NW/0739

  • Date of REC Opinion

    16 Sep 2015

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion