Fluorosis in adults: a feasibility study

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A feasibility study to assess the recruitment rates of adults assessing the effectiveness of fluoridated water

  • IRAS ID

    216233

  • Contact name

    Iain Pretty

  • Contact email

    iain.a.pretty@manchester.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of Manchester

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 8 months, 31 days

  • Research summary

    When researching the effectiveness of water fluoridation the majority of research to date has focused on children. One reason for this is the availability of an easy to access population of children through schools. There is a need to assess the effectiveness of water fluoridation in the adult population, however it is unknown how willing adults would be to consent and be recruited to a study of this nature. To assess this patients will be recruited to a study to investigate the prevalence of fluorosis in adults.

    Dental patients who are 18 years of age and older and due to attend their general dental practice for a routine appointment such as a dental check-up, will be issued an information sheet at least one week prior to their appointment. After their appointment they will be reminded of the study by their dentist and, if willing, directed to the researcher in a separate room of the dental practice. After taking informed consent an image of the patient’s front teeth will be taken, with a lip retractor in place. Patients will also be asked to provide consent for the research team to access their dental records. Levels of dental restorations will be recorded over the past two years and permission will be sought for access over the next two years. This future access to records is important to inform the design of future studies.

    Outcome measures will be the willingness to be recruited, the levels of restorations and the levels of fluorosis in the population.

  • REC name

    South Central - Hampshire B Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    16/SC/0672

  • Date of REC Opinion

    2 Dec 2016

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion