Feeling Down and What Helps: Male Perspectives (Version 1)

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Male Representations of Depression and Treatment: a Q Methodology Study

  • IRAS ID

    137032

  • Contact name

    Jennifer E House

  • Contact email

    jennifer.j.house@kcl.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    King's College London

  • Research summary

    How do men with depression represent depression and treatment, and how might this affect help-seeking behaviour?

    Background and Aims: Men are currently under-represented in services for depression. It is important to understand if and why existing interventions are not as acceptable to men as to women, as equity is a key element of quality of health care. The overall aim of this study is to guide development of suggestions for service providers about the types of intervention that are likely to be most acceptable, and therefore associated with the greatest uptake, for men with depression. The objectives are to explore how men with depression represent depression and treatment, and consider how this might affect help-seeking behaviour. Participants and Method: This study is exploratory in nature, aiming to identify perspectives, rather than test specific hypotheses. It will employ Q methodology, meaning that participants will be asked to consider statements of opinion about depression and treatment, and rate how much they agree with them, resulting in identification of patterns of thought. The sample will include men with depressive symptoms who have and have not sought help from services. Help-seekers will be recruited through Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT) services, and non-help-seekers will be recruited through newspapers, door-to-door leafleting, and non-clinical settings such as libraries and gyms. Funding: This study is being undertaken as part of a Doctorate in Clinical Psychology and is not externally-funded.

  • REC name

    London - Bromley Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    14/LO/0561

  • Date of REC Opinion

    16 May 2014

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion