Exploring stakeholders perceptions of TV ultrasound scan training

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Exploring stakeholders perceptions of transvaginal (TV) ultrasound scan training

  • IRAS ID

    109352

  • Contact name

    K M K Ismail

  • Contact email

    k.ismail@bham.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Birmingham Womens Hospital

  • Research summary

    Transvaginal (TV) ultrasound is a type of pelvic ultrasound that is widely used in the field of obstetrics and gynaecology; therefore many practioners need to be trained in its use. TV ultrasound uses an ultrasound probe inserted into the vagina to obtain the necessary images of the pelvis therefore is an intimate female examination. Published literature suggests that women are accepting of this examination when it is necessary for their medical care; however it is also known that having a TV scan can cause some pain and discomfort. A TV scan performed by a trainee examiner potentially exposes the woman to a longer and more uncomfortable examination for no additional clinical benefit. With the advent of high fidelity virtual reality ultrasound simulators becoming available as an alternative method to hands-on learning on real women the aim of this small scale qualitative study is to explore the perceptions of transvaginal ultrasound scan training amongst the stakeholders in training - women, trainers and trainees. This study seeks to set the foundation for later research on the best model to deliver transvaginal ultrasound training and how simulation training fits into such a model. It will underpin the development and delivery of innovative and effective methods of simulated ultrasound training by engaging the key stakeholders. Focus groups will be used to gain knowledge and understanding of the experiences and perceptions of women, trainees and trainers. In total eight focus groups will be carried out, each aiming to involve 6-8 participants, over a seven month period.

  • REC name

    North West - Preston Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    13/NW/0525

  • Date of REC Opinion

    5 Jul 2013

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion