Exploring patient understanding of voluntary admission experience V1

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Exploring how people make sense of and understand their experiences of voluntary psychiatric admissions to Acute Wards in East London; An Interpretative Phenomenological analysis.

  • IRAS ID

    219410

  • Contact name

    Catherine Iredale

  • Contact email

    u1525465@uel.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University of East London

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    N/A, N/A

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 11 months, 31 days

  • Research summary

    Acute Psychiatric Ward: Acute psychiatric wards are short-stay wards designed to treat people who are acutely distressed or “in crisis”. Average stay on an acute psychiatric ward is typically between 2 and 15 weeks.

    Voluntary Admission: Voluntary admission is the process of making an informed choice to enter a psychiatric hospital for treatment and is an alternative to being admitted ‘involuntarily’ via a section of the Mental Health Act (1983).

    Summary:
    Voluntary Admission has become an increasingly popular method of admission since its introduction around a century ago. In the last ten years there has been a burst of literature exploring inpatient experience of voluntary psychiatric admission however relatively little research explores the individuals' nuanced experience and understanding of these admissions in depth.

    A greater understanding of this experience would be beneficial as hospital admissions are often a person’s first contact with mental health services. It is here they may first experience relationships with professional staff and research shows that therapeutic relationships shape future perceptions of services and willingness to engage with support. This study aims to provide a richer examination of individual experiences in order to promote the voice of service users and inform and guide staff practise.

    Six participants will be identified from across the acute wards in East London Foundation NHS Trust. Potential participants will be approached by the clinical team to gain consent to discuss the study. Participants will be approached by the researcher either on the ward or following discharge by phone or at a community Recovery Team. Participants will be invited to engage in a semi-structured interview with the researcher. Interview questions will focus on participants' experiences and sense-making around their recent admission. Interviews will be transcribed and analysed by the researcher using interpretative phenomenological analysis.

  • REC name

    London - Central Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    17/LO/1410

  • Date of REC Opinion

    27 Sep 2017

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion