Evaluation of Roche combined SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG assay [COVID-19]

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Evaluation of Roche combined SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG assay

  • IRAS ID

    286435

  • Contact name

    Mark Hopkins

  • Contact email

    mark.hopkins2@nhs.net

  • Sponsor organisation

    Barts Health NHS Trust

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 3 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    Research Summary
    METHODS:

    - Collect serial serum samples from inpatients with PCR confirmed Covid-19 infection
    - Review clinical records to find date of onset of symptoms
    - Test all available serial samples for SARS-CoV-2 antibody using the Roche combined SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG assay
    - Present data in anonymised summary form

    AIMS/OBJECTIVES:

    - To complete a verification exercise for the commercial (Roche) assay allocated to our lab after PHE evaluation
    - To describe what proportion of confirmed Covid-19 seroconvert
    - To describe at what stage in illness seroconversion is seen
    - To see if there is any evidence of waning of antibody level after a longer (but limited) period of follow up

    Summary of Results

    The Roche Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 and the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay both had 100% specificity.

    •Overall sensitivity of the Roche assay was 92.1% at ≥14 days and 94.8% at ≥21 days, and the overall sensitivity of the Abbott assay was 94.4% at ≥14 days and 98.2% at ≥21 days.

    •Low rates of seroconversion seen in the immunocompromised (95.2% vs. 81.0% sensitivity at ≥21 days).

    •Sensitivity in the immunocompromised was numerically higher with the Abbott assay.

    •After excluding samples from immunocompromised patients sensitivity of both assays appeared excellent (100% for both assays at ≥21 days.

    •Short-term antibody waning was demonstrated with both assays.

    •Seroreversion was seen with the Roche assay.

  • REC name

    London - Riverside Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    20/HRA/4356

  • Date of REC Opinion

    10 Sep 2020

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion